So a year ago I posted a video of Zorro and I ( which has no lost it's music in an argument between Google and Warner ) was a kind of marker for where we were at the time. I figured the way to make that kind of marker useful is to give it points of comparison so on Saturday I got
sleepsy_mouse to take some more of our session.
Last year
penella22 told me off for doing myself down when posting about video, but this wasn't a great session - it had rained all morning and someone was a bit grumpy and we didn't feel like we were doing as well as we sometimes do. But then for me horsemanship, like singing in the car, always seems to go best when there is no-one around to witness it. Either way it's probably an honest representation of where we're at right now, if not a showcase for a whole lot of excellence. If I can get everything up to the standards of the best bits here by this time next year, though, I think I'll feel like I'm doing alright.
Last year
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 11:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 14:12 (UTC)You can see a few times when he's thinking it's time to break into canter up the arena. I never thought my "would rather stop than anything" cob would begin to offer that as an evasion xD
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 23:32 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 23:36 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 Oct 2009 15:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 13:06 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 14:13 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 14:57 (UTC)I went to a really interesting lecture/demo in Leighton Buzzard on Sunday, and the first half was a lecture by Dr Hilary Clayton on horse and rider biomechanics, and one of the things she showed us was actual analyses of how horses balanced themselves where they had measured the movement of the horses' centre of balance - and they were looking at how this changed during mounting, and how a healthy horse's balance pattern compared with that of a horse with neurological issues (thinking that this might provide a potential new diagnosis tool), how quickly foals developed adult balance - really, really interesting.
Re mounting from a block without the stirrups, she actually mentioned this (or mounting via leg-ups) as the preferred method of mounting in terms of mitigating the pressure forces on the horse's back, when compared with the pressure readouts from mounting from the ground and from a block with stirrups. So you're up there with the cutting-edge equine biomechanical advice... ;-)
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 16:20 (UTC)Poor old Zorro sometimes has to suffer the worst of my education, but bless him if he thinks I'm at all unstable he will treat me like crystal glass. Once he thinks I'm solid on his back it's rollercoaster time.
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 17:03 (UTC)I never learned to ride as a kid either - and I'm just starting to practice my bare-back riding on my very tolerant Icelandic pony (when he's not injured!) - and as for mounting from the ground bareback, I just embarrass myself!!
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 17:16 (UTC)With the saddle I suspect that if you could do it kind of vaulting style using even pressure and placing yourself lightly in the saddle on a big saddle like mine it wouldn't be too bad - it's never going to be the best thing for the horse but done right it's probably not too bad.
Buck Brannaman always mounts (and does a lot of other work ) off the fence, which is another neat way to do it.
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 17:31 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 18:20 (UTC)Did she happen to mention (or demonstrate) the technique they were using to mount? I picked up the habit somewhere along the way of setting my right hand on the right-side flap of the saddle while I mount rather than on the cantle in what seems to be the usual method--not sure where I got it, but it feels like it steadies everything and counterbalances the weight in the left stirrup as I step on, and I wonder what it would do (if anything) to those pressure spike.
(Bareback, I just do the belly-over-the-horse-and-shimmy-into-place thing. Which might work less well if I had a taller horse, but I don't, so everyone's happy.)
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 20:06 (UTC)I think getting on bareback is probably good practice for it as well, each time I have got on bareback from the ground ( there aren't many of them ) I've been better at getting into a saddle afterwards...
no subject
Date: 27 Oct 2009 10:36 (UTC)The main point she made was that either way it wasn't a dangerous level of pressure (predominantly because it was brief) but that obviously anything that reduced it would be beneficial to the horse in terms of potential sore points. Interestingly, what she did say showed very high spikes of pressure (much higher than the full weight in stirrup of the mounting process) was when people in saddle then put weight into opposite stirrup to shift saddle sideways to correct movement while mounting - which I am definitely guilty of doing in the past, so I shall be much more careful to avoid that.
Re the mounting bare-back - it's getting to the belly-over-the-horse stage that I find difficult! And I really have no excuse because my little pony is not even 14hands, but I have no idea how to go from standing next to him to belly-on-back (probably not necessary to mention that I wasn't a very athletic child! ;-) ). It's not the height, I think, but the technique!
no subject
Date: 27 Oct 2009 11:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 Oct 2009 12:03 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 13:40 (UTC)no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 14:13 (UTC)And I have no idea if he can see. He seems to think that either he can or it's not all that important...
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 14:46 (UTC)he does look a bit grumpy, haha. especially at the front. his side passing (whatever it's called) at 2mins is good to see tho. nice work.
do you use the lead swinging to reinforce the neck-reining at this stage?
no subject
Date: 26 Oct 2009 16:13 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 Oct 2009 16:35 (UTC)no subject
Date: 27 Oct 2009 21:18 (UTC)no subject
Date: 28 Oct 2009 12:24 (UTC)Had some questions (and a thought, but I'll save that for now, because depending on what you're going for it may not actually be at all useful) about the lateral work, if that's okay?
What are you looking for in that work, exactly? What's the goal?
no subject
Date: 28 Oct 2009 13:36 (UTC)I guess the other way we use some lateral work ( but not really the sidepass stuff there ) is to rebalance when someone is falling into the circle by just picking back out onto the circle I wanted to ride, rather than the circle that he wanted to be ridden on.
no subject
Date: 28 Oct 2009 15:32 (UTC)What I was wondering about is that--I'm not sure what terminology you'd use for it, exactly? Whether what you call a fore- or hindquarter yield is meant to be different than what I call a turn on the haunches or forehand. So maybe it's just that, if so.
But what I notice is that you may not be getting quite as much biomechanical benefit out of the lateral work as you might. There'll be a good step and then he kind of loses his balance and the crossover and carry behind--he'll start to rush around the turn instead of stepping deliberately and/or he'll go crooked through his shoulder and neck and just be walking straight ahead behind.
Which, y'know, is not necessarily a problem if the practical goal is "flip ends here so I can get this gate"! And certainly there's a time and place for just teaching the beastie that he can and should move his body and/or a part of it in a given direction on request without worrying too much about exactly how he does it. And I suspect the work you've mentioned on learning to do more (and teaching Zorro to respond more) to your leg will make a pretty dramatic change in all of this as it progresses.
But to get the suppling and engaging benefits of the lateral work, I wonder if it might not help if you were to occasionally slow down a notch and act a little more deliberately? Really look for that one. good. step at a time? Obviously going too slowly and carefully has its own pitfalls...! But speed can be the enemy in this kind of work if you're not real careful--it can be a way for the horse to avoid engaging. So something to watch, anyway.
no subject
Date: 28 Oct 2009 16:22 (UTC)That's a pretty good assessment of how we're working most of the time actually- it's really important for the whole "control of the feet" idea because you need to get that one foot and only that one foot which means most of the work we're doing in this direction is things like one-step-at-a-time turn on the forehand types of thing. The actual sideways is more something I found when I was experimenting with working on the rein and the feet and found that door was starting to open quite nicely.
In this case I thought that the one-step-at-a-time stuff ( which there is some of on the original video ) would probably send anyone watching the video off to sleep fairly quickly so it got edited - on purpose, unlike the cantering bit :)
no subject
Date: 28 Oct 2009 16:48 (UTC)Ha! There is that. :-p
no subject
Date: 29 Oct 2009 14:31 (UTC)Awesome music! Totally catpures the mood of a good trail ride, and bonus! it mentions dark horses. This year you have to *tell us* what the music is...before it gets taken down. (I have to go buy it and put it on my mp3 player).
Your groundwork shows a more obedient and more *attentive* horse this year. You can see he's not bored here, not contemplating ways to take over the world. He's tuned in, waiting for your next idea, and in general, seems happy to make that his idea too.
In watching you work on the ground, it highlights for me how BIG a reaction I have sometimes. I tend to go to NONONONO! a bit too quickly, and one thing that is nice here is that are calm and steady throughout, and look to really be in the moment.
Also, I see a much more *bendy* horse. I'm not sure that was in his vocabulary last year, was it?
Under saddle he is much more balanced and less stompy. I almost get the feeling he's thinking dressage thoughts under that mane.
And your shoulders--they're better. Less fetal, more balanced. :-)
Zorro looks very handsome in his western gear.
no subject
Date: 29 Oct 2009 14:32 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Oct 2009 16:04 (UTC)no subject
Date: 29 Oct 2009 16:20 (UTC)You're right about the changes there, and really they are changes in me that he reflects. Partly that I won't settle for him not bending or for him going off balance and all of that, so I just insist more on the thing I want now, partly because I know what the thing I want is.
The groundwork we were doing is kind of the basic stuff that he's pretty good at, but actually with the big reaction stuff, I say "could you do this for me? ... DO SOMETHING!" the important part being that the first part is exactly the cue I want ( and clear and understandable as I can make it ) and that the second part gets a big enough reaction that they won't want to do it again. As long as you're doing that you can just start finding tries and shaping them and you should rarely get to the second thing because they'll be doing something for your initial ask even if it's not exactly what you're after...